Wednesday, January 03, 2007

zer(0)

what is to pride in the big O?
maybe (one) felt too full of itself being first? or there were supposed to be no firsts at all!
or was it because nine needed a partner for ten to be born?
was it to say that it all begins as nothing and the higher up u wish to go, the hollower u need to be?
is it because one is an entity and zero meant no quantifying anymore?
was it supposed to be a primitive concept of binary?
or is it because you need a void, an emptiness, to define mass?
was zero supposed to be a point to start before the beginning?
or was it because so one could believe the standing of a universe within blank?
was it fully empty? or is it really full?
is it plausible that it is the concept of comparision? The introduction of neutrality. The concept of 'the other' to possibility, reality, existence, death.

....dedicated to
'jab jheero diya mere bharat ne!'